For each subset of R below, determine both the supremum and the infimum. You do not need to give a rigorous proof of your answer.
Supremum 5, infimum 1
Supremum 1/2, infimum -1
Supremum 1, infimum -1
Supremum √5, infimum −√5
Supremum 1, infimum 1/2
Let A be a nonempty, bounded set of real numbers. Let −A be the set {−x:x∈A}. Prove that
supA=−inf(−A).Let M=supA, which exists and is real as A is bounded. So ∀a∈A,M≥a. Then ∀y=−a∈−A, M≥a⇒−M≤−a=y. So −M is a lower bound for −A.
Suppose L is any lower bound for −A. So ∀a∈A, L≤−a⇔−L≥a so −L is an upper bound for A, and in particular −L≥M as M is the least upper bound of A, and we see that L≤−M, so −M is the greatest lower bound for −A.
That is, inf(−A)=−supA⇔supA=−inf(−A).
Give examples of;
A sequence of irrational numbers converging to a rational number
For instance, (sn)=(π/n).
A sequence of rational numbers converging to an irrational number
For instance, (sn)=((1+1n)n).
For each of the following sequences, determine its limit (usual Calculus reasoning will be helpful here), then prove that the sequence does indeed converge to this limit.
Let ϵ>0. Consider N=19(17ϵ−12). Then for n>N,
|2n−33n+4−23|=179n+12<179N+12=ϵ.So liman=2/3.
Let ϵ>0. Consider N=1/ϵ and n>N. Then
|cosnn|=|cosn||n|≤1|n|=1n<1N=ϵ.So lim(cosn)/n=0.
Let (sn) be a sequence in R.
Prove that limsn=0 if and only if lims2n=0. (Hint: This is an “if and only if” statement, so you will need to prove both directions of the statement.)
(⇒) Suppose limsn=0. Consider ϵ>0. Then there exists N so that n>N implies that |sn|<√ϵ.
So then |s2n−0|=s2n<ϵ. So lims2n=0.
(⇐) The reverse direction is very similar to the forward direction.
Prove that if sn=(−1)n that lims2n exists but sn diverges.
We have that sn diverges by Example 4 in Section 8 (pp41-42). Also, s2n=1 which converges to 1 as it is constant.